Morally permissible for abortion Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Morally permissible for spontaneous abortion - Essay ExampleIn this article, two basic assertions bequeath be fortified one that there are no good grounds to cogitate that abortion is morally incorrect and secondly, that there are good causes to prove that abortion is morally permissible. Providing a truncated critique of a known pro-life blood line is deemed necessary before we proceed with the construction of an argument for the moral permissibility of abortion. The eminent anti-abortion philosopher Marquis has stated that the future of a standard fetus includes a ring of experiences, projects, activities, and such which are identical with the futures of adult tender creations and are identical with the futures of young children...it follows that abortion is leading(predicate) facie seriously wrong. According to him, pop uping a fetus is nothing but killing a human being since the fetus is a future resemblance of human being which makes abortion morally wrong. He added t hat killing a fetus certainly implies a potential loss of value. All pro-life activists believe that killing children and infants is wrong in the same way as it is killing any human being (cited in Marquis 184-185). To counteract the premises of Marquis, Mary A. Warren, a well known pro-abortion feminist philosopher deduces the quest anti-abortion argument 1) It is wrong to kill innocent human beings, 2) fetuses are innocent human beings, and 3) therefore, it is wrong to kill fetuses. ... e biological species Homo sapiens and incorporates not only functioning children and adults, but also fetuses (even really early fetuses) and alive human bodies without working brains (e.g. those in irretrievable comas). The human in the moral wizard refers to all beings who are full-grown members of the moral community and includes all but only persons. Warren merely states that if human being has the same meaning in both the settings then one of them is questionable. The argument each presum es that it is incorrect to kill a fetus simply because it is a homo sapient or it is a member of the moral community. Further arguments are required to mop up the matter since both the claims are controversial. To clarify this matter, Warren next considers whether genetic humanity is sufficient enough for moral humanity. She asks What characteristics entitle an entity to be considered a person in the moral sense? Exemplifying her theory of personhood, Warren states that a being or entity to be considered a human being or a person in the moral sense must possesses more or less of the following characteristics (1) Consciousness, (2) Reasoning, (3) Self-motivate activity, (4) communication capability, and (5) the presence of self-concepts and self-awareness. She further added that the degree of a beings similarity to a person decides its degree of right to life. In other words, the more resemblance a being holds to a person, the stronger are its consideration for having a right to li fe, and the stronger its right to life is. On the basis of this theory, she claims that a fetus doesnt have any similarity to a person at any stage of its discipline to be considered enough for having the right to life (cited in Warren 259-260). Moreover, on the